It’s worse than we had imagined.
I wanted to read in full the famous letter to Sir Brady of the 1922 Committee by Owen Patterson because the Telegraph said it made many people change their mind and suddenly the threshold of 48 no confidence letters to the PM as Tory Leader was “exceeded” I wondered what powerful words must have Owen Patterson used to convince more people, well, it’s incredible, as a blogger who likes to post and to link material from Infowars PJ Watson and David Icke and I think, I’m a conspiracy theorist, well yes, she is a traitor: she herself in the name of Britain rejected a serious free trade agreement with the EU with no irish backstop whatsoever offered by the EU!
I link the full letter by Patterson from Sky news because is for free in full Link I couldn’t believe what I was reading, by the end of the long and very interesting letter Owen Patterson says and I quote:
“President Tusk offered just such an alternative in March: a wide-ranging, zero-tariff free trade agreement.
That deal foundered on the question of the Northern Ireland border, but existing techniques and processes can resolve this. From my October meeting with Michel Barnier, I know that a willingness exists on the EU side to explore these possibilities more fully. The meeting also confirmed that Tusk’s offer is still on the table.
Throughout this process, I have sought to support the government. The conclusion is now inescapable that the prime minister is the blockage to the wide-ranging free trade agreement offered by Tusk which would be in the best interests of the country and command the support of parliament.”
First of all we must all apologize to Tusk and the EU representatives because we were made believe by May that her deal was the only one at disposal and the irish backstop was imposed by bad EU while insiders know the irish backstop was invented by her and she rejected the very best offer “still on the table”. She IS a traitor it’s not about David Icke I think she is paid by someone to botch Brexit.
The other element that hit my mind more than the rest is here:
“The UK would not have the unilateral right to end the arrangement – under May’s ‘deal’ ed notes -. We could be locked into it indefinitely as a permanent rule-taker while paying £39bn for the privilege.
European customs experts regard the withdrawal agreement’s customs arrangements as woefully out of date, proposing physical stamps and paper systems not used for nearly 20 years. They are so vague that it would be impossible to put them into practice.”
She didn’t send to Brussels competent people on purpose:
“It was a mistake for our EU negotiations to be led by a career civil servant with no business experience when the government had on hand a vastly experienced international trade negotiator, Crawford Falconer.”
Now from the curriculum of Mr. Crawford Falconer:
“Crawford Falconer is the United Kingdom’s Chief Trade Negotiation Adviser”
“Falconer has served in variety of roles including the New Zealand Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the World Trade Organisation(WTO), and as New Zealand’s Chief Negotiator and Adviser”
So May doesn’t want too experienced people negotiating the Brexit deal and sent the career civil servant and main Botcher-of-Brexit.
Sorry, guys, but yes, I don’t think she does it for free, I think she’s paid by some group of rich Remainers.
Now I expect she loses the no confidence vote.
For the rest, the letter in full is very interesting.