And also Barnier rejects Theresa May’s Brexit Deal. I think this is a Record. WTO Rules anyone?

Opening of Elevate Wokingham in Wokinhham LibraryJohn Redwood MP
John Redwood MP prominent Brexiteer that I quote a lot in this article to make trade and custom union things clear.

Done. Also the EU rejects Theresa May’s “Brexit plan” I think at this point there is only Hard Brexit – no deal exit on the table – which is a very welcome solution, my favourite – no one seemed to like Theresa May’s “plan”, Cameron described it in a private conversation with Johnson “the worst of both world” hard brexiteers didn’t like it, mild brexiteers don’t exist, they have never existed the ones who wanted Brexit overwhelmingly just wanted to get rid of the EU, Remainers didn’t like it, remainer in chief Anna Soubry described Theresa May as “moved by the forces of darkness” (?) seriously and the “forces of darkness” allegedly were Jacob Rees Mogg – good shape for the darkness and a lot of money too – and finally the EU in the person of Michel Barnier didn’t like it either. Nail in the coffin, I suppose, what else does Theresa May need to understand that her “plan” is pretty unlikable? She did strike.

According to Jacob Rees Mogg – out of the darkness – we’re finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel: No deal, no ties with Brussels whatsoever and commerce regulated under the easy and welcome WTO rules Link

It’s not just Jacob Rees Mogg who’s not taking a gun to shoot himself in despair because finally the horrible deal was killed off, many people – me included – long for no deal, because no-deal is hard Brexit aka freedom.

I copy & paste some statements about the outcome of a no-deal Brexit and WTO rules from John Redwood’s Diary, the best pen to understand trade and customs and world commerce things without being an expert of such issues personally.

From FirstArticle The WTO global trading model and Mr Barnier – time for the media to mend its language

“No Deal” is the WTO global trading option. Far from being without trading rules and without a working system for importing and exporting, the UK would rely on the WTO system for its EU trade just as it relies on that system for the bulk of its trade today which is conducted with non EU states.

“Crash out” are the words often used by Remain to describe leaving without paying the EU £39bn for the privilege of leaving. As we do not owe them any money, most people would call that just leaving, not crashing out. We will not crash, and will have lots more cash.

“Fall off the cliff edge” is another fatuous phrase they use. There is no cliff edge. Planes will fly and lorries will move through ports the day after we leave just as they did the day before. We will carry on trading and travelling, investing and being tourists in each other’s countries, as we do today in numerous non EU countries.

As the bulk of the UK’s trade with the EU is imports, I assume even Mr Barnier will understand they need continued decent access to the UK market. The good news for them is we are offering that, as long as it is reciprocal and within WTO rules.”

I  (Paola) think this is very clean and clear as usual on John Redwood’s side, and ironically “even Mr. Barnier understands they need continued access to the UK market”

From Second chosen Article: Let’s thank the Irish PM for showing us how absurd Project Fear has become

“There are international agreements allowing overflights. Irish planes will still fly over the UK once we have left, and UK planes will still fly over Ireland. BA is of course part of IAG, an Anglo Spanish  company with a headquarters in Madrid,  so does the Irish PM anyway not see that as an EU company that will carry on flying?”

From the Third chosen Article: Trade is mainly about companies and individuals, not governments

“In the never ending UK Parliamentary debates on trade the advocates of us staying in or rejoining the EU customs union, or inventing a customs union with them similar to one we are leaving, never give up and never find any new and convincing arguments. Three times Parliament voted down staying in the customs union by a large majority. Last night Parliament voted it down yet again by a small  majority. As someone who likes Parliamentary democracy and thinks things should be settled here by lively debates and votes, I am also allowed to ask how many more times do we have to make the same decision?” (great ed.notes)

From the Fourth chosen Article: The Customs and Trade bills

“On March 29 2019 VAT must become a UK tax which we can change as we see fit. The government agrees.”

“The government has also agreed to accept an amendment which says that the UK would not collect EU customs duties  for the EU unless the EU collected UK customs for the UK.

Yesterday’s debate was dominated by people who have never run complex supply chains who were unwilling to accept they work fine with  non EU as well as with EU parts. – the Remainers ed. notes – We needed to explain all over again how TIR, Authorised Economic Operators, the WTO Facilitation Agreement, electronic manifests and calculations and checking loads away from the border currently operate to speed goods across borders.”

 

Advertisements

Theresa May is a Remainer who has remained a Remainer: Pick up your favourite Brexit’s “pastry-sentence”.

Strawberry-Cream-Puffs-1-2

There are peculiar treats, one of our favourites are the mini Brexit pastry- delicacy-sentence, according to me one of the best is Jacob Rees-Mogg’s “Theresa May is a Remainer who has remained a Remainer”.

pastryCream

Then there is John Redwood’s “The White Paper proposes the UK staying in much of the current EU. White is the colour of the flag of surrender.” Link

puff_pastry_fruit_tarts_ricotta_cream_filling13.

Dominic Lawson: “Any Brexit plan that Peter Mandelson and Jacob Rees-Mogg BOTH think is hopeless, must be an absolute stinker”Link

cannoli

Theresa May: “Donald Trump told me to sue the EU”.

Gosh, and now please exit and let me out.

ILY – I love You ed. notes –

Who has quit over May’s Brexit policy?

David Davis – Brexit secretary

Boris Johnson – Foreign secretary

Steve Baker – Brexit minister

Scott Mann – ministerial aide

Robert Courts – ministerial aide

Conor Burns – ministerial aide

Chris Green – ministerial aide

Maria Caulfield – Tory vice-chair

Ben Bradley – Tory vice-chair

Plus all the Tory and Labour Brexiteers and we think Theresa May’s period is gone.

What will come next? Jacob Rees-Mogg supports a Johnson Government and I have to say “Johnson” sounds like a British prime Minister’s name, I cannot link all the articles I find sentences in now because in Britain they’re in a frenzy and the HomePage of the DM is refreshed quickly, now more than one want to just cut the head to the EU bull and the only thing that may oppose a Johnson Government is Boris Johnson fatidical shyness in giving the impression he may want to be PM for personal power-hunger, and that’s a mistake, I have cursed in my previous article Ms. Giorgia Meloni for refusing the post of Italian Defence Secretary in change of support to Luigi DiMaio premiership because she was scared of being accused of being an opportunist power-hungry sort of politician etc. she did wrong, very wrong because now we have a Defence Secretary who doesn’t do really the interests of the Nation, she should have done it, I cursed her for having refused, had she accepted I’d promote her and support her in four languages.

Now Johnson, Boris, do not dare and refuse, time for tentativeness is up, Brexit must be Brexit, I stick here the beautiful, clear resignation letter of Scott Mann, not because is better than the others, but because it’s very communicative being short & clear:

North Cornwall MP Scott Mann said he was 'not prepared to compromise' the wishes of his constituents to 'deliver a watered down Brexit'

This a short but powerful example of how democracy works: the MP talks with the constituents, the citizens, and votes in the Parliament according to their wishes. And this is wonderful.

So Boris, don’t be shy.

BorisJohnson

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5957055/Boris-Johnson-preparing-devastating-resignation-speech-targeting-Theresa-May.html#v-3972615587456528531

And finally I have to say that there is another reason for Britain to change PM: Trump.

Boris Johnson is in good terms with Trump, praised him and does not treat him “like a schoolboy” as Theresa May unfortunately does, Trump is giving a big hand against globalisation and the NWO and not just to the USA, but to all countries that want to keep their culture and stand on their feet.

In Britain the minor royals, all but the Queen did not want to meet him and welcome him, William, Harry, Kate I don’t like them. Is this the Meghan-Marklization of the Royals? Lefty royals don’t last.

William went to Polo why? and why wasn’t Trump invited to the Polo match, eventually? He went to Scotland and the First Minister went to the gay pride, then if Trump tells you to defend yourself by yourself he’s right. He’s also right in liking Putin more than May.

Try to set things right or tell William to get another job.

I’ve got the impression the Queen is the only one who has a feeling she has some duties as a Queen not just rights and treats. As for Charles he’s quite hated, he didn’t greet Trump but was seen with prince Philip at the annual Bilderberg-meeting in Turin aka promoting globalisation. Because he’s stupid.

So are the Markles&Spencers & Middletons suggesting we should abolish the borders of our Nations but just pay to keep them four or five with a bunch of picked up friends of theirs and boot-licker courtiers safe in walled castles – they can have walls around them but they don’t meet Trump – playing polo and buying Dior? Solve this problem, please. I respect royals and traditional institutions solely as a form of respect towards the British people who want to be represented by them, but I don’t think they perceive it this way. They feel entitled in a superior way and after Meghan they make political statements, I don’t like it and I don’t think I have to respect them if they do politics.

Charles is an insect in comparison to Trump and Meghan is just a whore who after plastic surgery managed to get fucked by the right man to enter a walled mansion. And that’s it. That’s your royals.

Paola Distilo

Salvini & Conte are behaving like globalists and I don’t like it. Don’t you let them take you for fools.

Salvini sings victory like a jerk and the Corriere publishes his little letter, in reality for me they have betrayed everyone both Conte who is a no-one because he wasn’t elected that Ms. Trenta the idiotic Defence Secretary and Salvini: he continues to sing victory as a jerk but meanwhile he takes the migrants, all landed in Europe, now my goal is not to destroy Europe, these migrants are legally illegal immigrants not refugees and other European countries should not take them, Salvini has yielded and continues to shout and bark “closed ports, may they go back to Libya” then “only women and children” then eventually everyone can land. Link

The only thing that can save us is Brexit if God wants it it will destroy the European Union.

Salvini’s stupid victory chant “they landed to Europe not to Italy” is contrary to the logic, they can not even land to Europe if it is only for that, I hope the other Europeans do not take them, but that is a globalist, anti-national and pro UE chant, So what’s the point of keeping the Lega for Padania still, if even Italy is not there anymore?
CONTE IS AN IDIOT, HE CONTINUES TO ASK MIGRANTS TO BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: HE SHOULD JUST NOT LET THEM LAND AND SEND THEM BACK TO LYBIA NO MATTER THE EU, THAT’S UP IN ARMS TO GIVE CONTRACTS FOR HANDLING IMMIGRATION TO PRIVATE ENTITIES LINK WHICH WILL PROBABLY MEAN SOROS & ROTHSCHILD THAT IS FUCKING JEWS WHO WANT TO DESTROY ALL EUROPE AND ARE BEHIND SALVINI’S AND CONTE’S ATTEMPT TO SEND THE MIGRANTS NORTH AND NOT TO AFRICA. RIGHT?

I can not stand them anymore, this Giuseppe Conte with Elisabetta Trenta who continue to send the Coast Guard and also the Finance to save the migrants give me a sense of disgust.

Then they go to tell the other Europeans “you have to take them to Paris and Malta etc.” They just do not have to send Italian ships and pick them up, it’s not true that they have to share them with other Europeans, but is Malta btw that sends the Italian Coast Guard ships to pick up migrants? Is it Berlin? Is it Paris? She is sending the CoastGuard ships to take them and I mean Ms. Elisabetta Trenta Italian stupid fattish Defence Secretary – another thanks to that idiot of Giorgia Meloni of Brothers of Italy that I unfortunately also voted for refusing the Ministry of Defense in exchange for support to Luigi DiMaio, never more FdI, otherwise there would be a Right-winger as Defence Secretary instead of this fat woman who looks like an unemployed housewife and instead is reservist of the army (in fact the army is fine) found in the Easter egg by DiMaio and does crap -, it was Berlin or Mattarella to tell Conte to take migrants, then?

ElisabettaTrentaConDiMaio
Italian Minister of Defense, found in the Easter egg by Luigi DiMaio.

Let’s go back to voting: I want a very right-wing government for real. I would not take them either as Malta or as Berlin, because the problems are all caused in Rome, at the Ministry of Defense where Ms. Trenta still sends Italian ships in Libyan SAR and at the Quirinal where there is the son of a whore of a Mason Mr. Mattarella who called Conte to tell him to take the migrants – from the Quirinal, yes -. I do not want that the other Europeans take them if Italy continues to send Italian and Italian Red Cross ships to take them even outside the Italian territorial waters, Conte and Salvini must be clear with their fellow countrymen:

  1. With those of the Italian Red Cross that – said by Gino Strada – pay € 400,000 to the MOAS to get the contract to take immigrants – and who puts the money in the coffers of the Italian Red Cross? And if they are willing to pay € 400,000 for the contract to go and get them how much do they earn? – Link
  2. With Elisabetta Trenta at the Ministry of Defense on which the Coast Guard depends who sends Italian ships to rescue migrants in Libyan and Maltese SAR. She’s a bitch, sorry, but I’m very angry with this mob today.
  3. With the Quirinal, with “saint” Mattarella – that I hope he will end up like his brother – shot  -.

Neither Seehofer, Merkel nor that guy of Malta have to take the migrants, it seems clear to me that inside the Italian institutions there are still those who continue to play the smooth Gentiloni’s game, that is: you sing it and you play it, aka you go there and take immigrants and then you complain there is the crisis and want to change Dublin’s rules. And that’s a globalist move and I don’t like it. Malta, on the other hand, does not take them rightly because they, the migrants, just do not have to leave, it is not true that anyone who starts from Libya has to be charged on some European Country’s back  “because they do not want to return to Libya”. They are Africans may they stay in Africa.

Let’s go back to the elections, please.

And pray for Hard Brexit. Go Boris and Jacob & Co.

A Eurosceptic the Size of Trump, a Liar the Size of May and a Drunkard the Size of Juncker. Why It will be Hard Brexit.

It’s a theater, more than a theater, worse than a theater: Jean Claude Juncker completely, really, out of metaphor drunk and no one can make him step down, resign, remove him from the post of President of the European Commission – yes, the President of the European Commission:

Now, I swear that I don’t hate Juncker, I swear that if I could, I’d help him, but I do swear that I want out of the EU, I am Italian and I want out and I hope Britain will do Hard Brexit, no, don’t tell me anything because to have a system the dimension and the power of the EU where the President of the Commission, the upmost position, can be so drunk, in the morning at a public official event and no one can ask for his resignation, removal, make an impeachment etc. gives the brand of the EU, it’s not a monarchy, it’s not a dictatorship: it’s worse. You rely on this for trade? For immigration? For human rights for anything? You’re drunker than Juncker. Close it, it’s a wrong system, it’s the lowest level ever reached by Europe.

By luck the biggest Eurosceptic of them all is the President of the United States of America and that’s great, Trump supports Johnson, who in comparison to Juncker is a christian monk, I mean he gets drunk at times, but in the evening not at NATO summit in the morning and the democratic UK system requires resignation for much less than that. Very welcome the resignation of Johnson, Davis and Steve Baker and the rest of the Brexiteers crew like Maria Caulfield one of my favourite ’cause being a politician still she manages to look human, Link her reasons in the end you cannot save it all with a liar the size of Theresa May who claims she likes immigrants for…let me guess, oh yes the contribution to the country, particularly to London safety & Rotherham, when you’ve got a drunkard the size of Juncker and a Brexiteer the size of Trump and all the Telegraph steering, much wisely – because that’s wisdom – for Hard Brexit, you must get there and do it an then start from the very next day with a UK-USA trade deal, you cannot humiliate the public so much as to give Juncker still some  connection with their things, they pay money for the EU and that’s the EU, unelected bureaucrats with no obligation, not even to decency and unremovable whatever they do. Stop depicting it as if it were something better looking and less smelly of alcohol: it’s indecent. And by now, you should have learnt it.

Never Accept the Unknown Superiors and that’s a basic rule for cunning people.

I am intolerant with trolls, I remove them, delete them from the feed of the comments of youtube, but if they make an acceptable consideration before or after an insult, I can also give me the time & pleasure to respond. Now a troll that I have already deleted from youtube has said that I must know that the br – acronym of Brigate Rosse a communist terrorist Italian organisation usually written as all acronyms in Capitals as BR but he did it in tiny letters – it was, in reality, the CIA – and what else could it be? – But really, so I have to know it? But if not even Ms Adriana Faranda, one of them, knows it? Yes, it has been said, and Steve Pieczenik has revealed publicly that even for the CIA, for the United States of America it was important that Aldo Moro – Italian Prime Minister kidnapped and killed shot by the BR in 1978 –  did not come alive from there, at that time President of the United States was Jimmy Carter, No. 39 , between Ford and Reagan, from 1977 to 1981, Nobel Peace Prize, but for this reason we do not have illusions, as well as pro-Palestinian and this is good for us while the Soviet leader was Aleksej Kosygin from October 1964 to October 1980 and in Italy there were Aldo Moro, centrists christian democrat PM and Berlinguer, leader of the Italian communist party and these Red Brigades, Brigate Rosse, wanting revolution and kidnapping people around the country indeed.

Now all is well with me, but not that an intelligent person agrees not to know if he takes orders from the head of the Soviets or the CIA – this happens when one accepts the anonymous hierarchy “The Unknown Superiors” which are also typical of the Satanic sects of the rich ones, given that Ms. Faranda was truly Communist and Inge Feltrinelli, repeatedly accused directly of being among the organizers of the kidnapping, as well as – sic – of the murder, with spikes of suspicion such that Moro was killed in a hurry because he had recognized her eyes and her voice from the balaclava as Moro, a person of intelligence and memory noticeably above the average, is not an opinion is a biographical datum, which did not frequent people  like Faranda but was instead handcuffed with the rich left-wingers – see Berlinguer – having recognized her, once released from prison would have put her in trouble, but these are only suspects, what is a given and not a suspect is that Adriana Faranda once released in 1994 was taken by Feltrinelli as a photographer – it seems to me that even Inge was a photographer – and I saw the photo and read the news on the Espresso that back in 1994 I used to read regularly.

So Inge was manipulated by the CIA? And did she sacrifice Faranda to jail? Or even a person with heritage, the social position of Inge Feltrinelli – who was personally a “nobody” but she got pregnant with Giangiacomo Feltrinelli an Italian millionaire turned crazy-communist and mocked for that by the other Italian rich ones who could not possibly understand him, and after the death of the latter despite being already ex-wife, the fourth where Giangiacomo at death had already arrived at five – she did manage the estate on behalf of the baby, and she was given orders by the CIA and did not realize it? I think badly of Inge Feltrinelli, a Sephardic Jewess born in Germany, a militant communist but an intimate friend of the heirs of Jewish Zionist Warburg bankers so much so that they suspect – and perhaps of course – ties with Mossad, an intimate friend means that when Inge went to New York, the Communist was sleeping at the Warburg heir home, do not have any illusions about the left “kosher, caviar and Che Guevara” but was she manipulated by the CIA? From Carter?

Of course it was times when the secret agents were heroes of beautiful detective movies, espionage films, I personally was just two years old, the Christian Democrat grandmother, a socialist grandfather, nothing more. But to understand in all this intrigue between Jewish bankers, pro-Palestinian leftwing activists, Feltrinelli who married and remarried – they had not yet made the law on divorce, otherwise 5 wives would have arrived in his underwear and perhaps would have done less damage – being able to understand who was manipulating whom … And we hypothetically assume:

That Faranda and Moretti were seriously communists.
That Inge was somehow linked to them, but we do not know exactly how.
That the real terrorists, Faranda, Moretti & Co. really communists … took orders from “unknown superiors” and this is the real misstep.
Generally the unknown superiors are made to accept with the excuse that if they torture you do not have to know their names, so not knowing them you can not betray them, but this should make you reflect on a small detail: that you in this story are designated to be the one that ends up in jail and eventually tortured and they are the ones in the villa with swimming pool to do the Unknown Superiors. That your part is the wrong one, that is, they gave you the knife on the side of the blade. And you shouldn’t accept – Idiot -.

To take orders from a public telephone that rings at 11:30 hours in Rome and the incognito messenger of the unknown superiors tells you “go to kidnap Moro” and you, after they arrest you for kidnapping and murdering the Prime Minister, do not even know if he was a Carter or a Kosygin man ?

Steve Pieczenik knew who his superiors were and from Kosygin he would not take orders.

The only thing certain is that it is obviously wrong, it is not very smart to take orders without knowing who is in the hierarchy. The superiors one must know who they are, as in the army. This is one of the reasons why I am very opposed to entry into sects and freemasonry, in the end for a shiver not even feline, you do not even understand if you are working for the CIA or the Soviet Union, because according to the Espresso right-wing people supposedly have a low-IQ. Mm and then how do you have it, in the far-left? The CIA is accused of all that is unknown, besides of course the Mossad and a bit of the Knights Templar, even the murder of Elvis Presley and then to some extent something will be true, but as perhaps at the CIA they are not fools like Faranda they let talk and do not say.

Yes, you can take orders from the CIA, provided that you know it: Steve Pieczenik knew it, the others … they make mental wanking from the prison or their rooms and sometimes, without knowing, they even guess, Robbie Williams suspects Elvis’s death maybe yes, maybe not and what remains in any case is “advertising space”: the posters with the face of Elvis hanging a bit everywhere.

CIAVault7

cIA

Kate looks British, Meghan looks American, wears foreign labels and is pro abortion. Can’t you discard her?

KateWilliamKate

Well, if there is someone who’s promoting the English style is Kate Middleton, she even looks bored in that pleasant-noble way. And wears fair colours for trooping the colours and shuts up about abortion and political issues.

The other

NoMeghanNoRoyal

An American actress dressed in black, who doesn’t even promote the British clothes, the only thing she could do to say thanks for the treats and the money, a bit plain, surgically enhanced and even pro abortion – like Wallis Simpson, who allegedly had an abortion –

Can’t you get rid of her? Make a referendum for having a republic then decide because you know, it’s not so given for granted that taxpayers have to pay for a couple of actors greeting them from a balcony, the Queen seems just an old lady who cares only about pushing her nephews, to convince you that you need this to represent the country is laughable. Meghan is completely self-serving, wears Dior like the wife of an Argentinian dictator on the base that she likes Dior, doesn’t feel any duty, crosses legs at church and looks as if she were going to a happy funeral. I don’t like her, as for abortion, she is a bitch, she cannot say she’s pleased with it, she is a political enemy and must be eliminated. Basically also the Queen should be eliminated, rumours of pedophilia, satanism, and now the abortionist American actress wearing foreign labels and smirking “like the cat who got the cream” and is interested in nothing else, what do you need them for?

 

I don’t know whether she’s a satanist, but Kate still looks the part of the British nobility, look at the pleasant bored-face, it’s incredible in this

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/embed/video/1724498.html

she has something of a more elegant Scarlett O’Hara, if I marry I’d like to look so bored, having to be inspired by a style, I’d choose Kate’s, I’m not joking, I love this, I studied English literature.

Yes, if it weren’t for women’s rights I’d be tempted too by Islam, but..

MusulmaniPreti
Article, priests want more immigrants, but why?

“To have them, Inzaghi’s money” Christian Vieri would sing it and “To have them, the balls of Muslims” sometimes I would sing it, when I see the bishops boasting that “in order to save lives I would turn all churches into mosques” Link … mm, and then? Then as the volunteers on the Vos Thalassa the Muslims would slaughter the priests, Islam, me it can not have me, for reasons of rational convenience: I am female, I agree with that Jesus Christ who liberalized the women, spoke at the well with the woman adulterous, sinful, multisposed (it must have been Afef Jnifen) yes it is true I did not do that kind of sins, but I like to go round alone and am one of those who, by Kabbalah “suffer in position of submission” for some reason, I want to be free. But Islam the priests treat them right, that sect of fags of the devil so-called eunuchs for God is now fasting – if it is true – against the yellow-green government, against Salvini, Salvini, Salvini, always Salvini and against DiMaio and Conte, because they don’t want to take all the muslim migrants the NGOs would like to bring and don’t really want to “transform all churches in Mosques” as Bishop Nogaro is apparently ready to do. We should really treat them as the Muslims treat them, slaughter them and make them pay the taxes to the State, not vice versa, that we have to pay taxes to keep them doing nothing.

Please do not give them the tax-money for their maintenance, may their beloved muslims pay for them.

I hate them.

As for me, they are lucky that I am a girl, otherwise Islam could tempt me. How disgusting these priests are. The Muslims would give them the full monty indeed. Never seen a level of betrayal like what there is now.

Perhaps we should enter into the point of view of ideas that the Vatican is not a normal place, that it is not so normal that a man at the age of twenty-four – yes, 24 – make vows of chastity, poverty and obedience and then goes mad, cites Islam, says that Our Lady is virgin, that Joseph his true husband, however, never touched her, but according to these criteria marriage would be null and therefore Joseph is not her true husband is only a guardian and that She speaks to a Lady in Bosnia who owns a hotel for pilgrims and sells statues – forbidden by the Almighty btw -. Perhaps they would like to be freed from the prison in which they entered, perhaps it would be seriously appropriate for us to think, but seriously, to discard them.